Skip to main content

Istanbul: The Ottoman Empire


The Ottoman Empire, at its zenith spanned across three continents namely Asia, Africa and Europe. The Ottomans controlled the Mediterranean waters and the lands on its periphery including Spain on the west and modern day Turkey on the East. The name ‘Ottoman’ has its history in the founder of the dynasty, Osman 1, ‘Ottoman’ being the anglicized version of Osman.

The Ottomans established themselves formally as an empire with the fall of the Byzantine capital Constantinople, modern day Istanbul, in 1453. Now, to me, The City of Istanbul attracts. I am not sure about the source of that attraction but I believe the history and the culture of the city play a significant part substantiating that attraction apart from Bollywood’s portrayal of the city.

Istanbul has a very special geographical status in terms of the modern day nation-state arrangement of territories across continents. The city cannot be discussed in isolation with the Ottoman Empire and its history. The story of the rise of the Ottoman Empire is as interesting as it gets. It has lessons concerning how religion can be made a weapon to wage wars and expand territories. The history of the Ottoman Empire teaches us the art of sustaining an overarching government with immense diversity within its subjects; a lesson modern day nation states continue struggling with.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Non-Violence as a strategy

It cannot be said with certainty whether the idea to put the other cheek up after receiving a slap on one is still celebrated or not. However, it can be safely assumed that if there were a choice between returning the slap to the perpetrator and giving him another chance to repeat the attack, few would choose the latter. Arguably, it was the New Testament that first proposed this idea, which was then followed and propagated to the public at large to varying degrees by leaders around the world. The idea of non-violence has taken many different shapes and forms as it has translated into the real world. It is interesting to investigate how an idea that leaders and thinkers like Gandhi and Tolstoy held so close to their hearts came to be under the purview of strategy.  To many, pacifism is a tool of the weak as it dissociates from the idea of using strength in its conventional form. It is argued; those lacking the traditional means to confront the established authority seek refuge in non
2 comments
Read more

REALISM: THE BALANCE OF POWER

The term ‘Balance of Power’ is attributed to Otto Van Bismarck who while uniting Germany paid special attention to not disturbing the balance of power in erstwhile Europe. The term has since become part of commonly used vocabulary in media and academics alike. Balance of Power (BoP) says that states act to preserve a balance or equilibrium of power in the system. Kenneth Waltz talks about BoP in his book “Theory of International Politics”. BoP itself appears as a part of structural realism in Kenneth Waltz’s book. Waltz argues that the Anarchical world order breeds mistrust in the international structure where increase in the power/resources of one state is seen with caution. According to Kenneth Waltz, the self regarding states act to maximize their power by all possible means. Some states do succeed in aggregating greater power to the envy of other nation-states in the system. As soon as a state acquires power more than other states, a wave of discomfort runs through the system alarm
1 comment
Read more

Role of Communication in conflict and its resolution

To underline the significance of communication, it is said very often that ‘Communication is the first fatality in any conflict’. The idea behind this statement brings about the positive role communication plays in resolving conflicts very efficiently. The statement presents a clear observation which is evident in many if not all the conflicts. Very often, Parties in conflict do stop communicating. The positive force behind communication is considered so pious that absence of communication is often related to the existence of a dormant conflict. Thus, ‘communication is treated as a utilitarian device employed in pursuit of resolution.’ However, what is often glossed over is the part communication plays in introducing a conflict. Communication is indeed an irreplaceable tool when it comes to resolving a conflict but it would be naïve to believe that all communication leads to resolution. As a matter of fact, communication not only resolves conflicts but also acts a divisive force whic
Post a Comment
Read more